Agree with this. Design by committee is a bad way to agree on product direction Some centralized product direction would be really good for Ethereum IMO Need to answer the q of who are Ethereum’s first class citizen users, and then build for them
Generally, think founders are better off not listening to investors who steer them to capitalize on a new hot thing (e.g., new L1/infra play) It only makes sense if you actually believe in the hot thing and deeply understand it Most of the time though, the hot thing evaporates
Many parallels between blockspace and bandwidth buildout https://t.co/jrYIoWmYPg
Interestingly, most of the winning infra teams are rarely the first to come up with an idea/GTM, but always have the best execution of the ideaPut another way, they're rarely on the bleeding edge of research but are always on the bleeding edge on GTM once idea is proven
Hard to say for sure, but suspect many people who were in crypto 2015+ were greatly influenced by how bitcoin turned from payments to digital gold through effective memesThat said, suspect that on a long time horizon, memes will create less value than income generating assets
Always surprised by how few people watch crypto conference presentations/panelsGoldmine of information + often higher quality than a podcast https://t.co/XCxeDRiSG7